Is the government missing out the wood for the trees?

The adage missing the woods for the trees describesreturn...
a situation where the focus on the big picture is lost by1. Reedbeds already dry and clogged with brambles
one's short sighted preoccupation with relatively less2. Heath lands have vanished and scrubs taken over
important small details. The UK government's decisiontheir place
to sell national reserves, forest land and withdrawal of3. Wetlands have dwindled with rivers and canals
grants to British Waterways which manages 2,300being clogged by invasive plants
miles of canals and rivers as part of the 40% cut in4. Farmland birds are on the verge of extinction
the budget of the Department for Environment , Food5. Meadows and the country's bat population are
and Rural affairs seems to be a typical example ofvanishing
this syndrome. 6. Uplands have become degraded and their ability to
The proposed cut threatens to impact the environmentprovide clean water drastically reduced
in two ways. A cut in welfare expense to 1/3 of theA budget cut would mean the end of coastal habitats
present outlay to Natural England the principal naturelike salt marsh and saline lagoons, reefs and other
conservation agency responsible for the country'smarine systems so vital for flood control and
waterways, air, soil, pollution control, waste control andprevention of erosion. If paths and bridleways are not
river protection will have a degenerating effect on allkept open huge swathes of the famed English
of these vital conservation activities. On the other handcountryside and the coast would be closed to millions
such a step would also set back nature conservationpermanently
by many years and hinder the creation of new marineThe Secretary General of the UN Council of Biological
nature reserves.Diversity has warned that it would be very short
While granting over key nature reserves to bigsighted to cut biodiversity spending. There cannot be a
business would ring the death knell of eco protectionmore emphatic caution than what the Secretary
and natural heritage, we can be prosecuted by the EUGeneral has conveyed in the following words 'You
for not complying with the European birds and habitatsmay save a few pounds now but you will loose billions
directive. Leading conservation groups have made alater, biodiversity is your natural asset, the more you
joint statement to the government on the profoundloose it the more you loose your cultural assets too.
and irreversible consequences for wildlife, landscapesThere could not have been a better way of putting
and people and have cautioned how short termacross the perils of neglecting nature. We could only
savings would translate into huge long term costs forhope that it makes the powers that be realize what
the economy and national well being.they are doing to the natural heritage of this country in
These groups have highlighted that the countrysidethe name of cost cutting and they realize the gravity
and environment are not in the pink of health todayof their actions before it is too late.
and a cut in cost could take things to a point of no