Carbon Credits to Save Wildlife, Wetlands and Forested Sanctuaries

Does it make sense to allow those with open spacemore costs. If the costs rise significantly, other energy
property to secure energy carbon credits, in trade forcompanies and manufacturers will eventually enter the
not developing on their property to save wildlife? Themarket with less polluting equipment to do the same
question is relevant because many people who havething, but that will happen anyway as the costs of R
such property do not plan on developing the propertiesand D for new alternative energies and pollution saving
anyway, thus they would be getting "free money" andequipment get critical mass in order to enjoy the
in the process this would increase the land values byeconomies of scale.
that amount plus a speculation factor.Thus, why do we need an energy trading scheme?
Additionally, these carbon credits will be bought byNow, do not get me wrong, if such energy carbon
traders, who will make money and sell those credits tocredits are available, I will be involved and I will make
corporations who already pollute and have no interestmoney on them, nevertheless, it seems like a bunch of
in stopping whatever it is that they are doing, it will onlyhot air to me. Therefore, I question those who are
cost them more to do it. These costs will be passedpromoting these schemes and would like to have a
on to all consumers and that will mimic inflation, thus,serious debate or national discussion on this issue. I
resemble an over all tax on everything we buy.think the American People deserve at least that much.
There will be no less pollution in the short term, onlySincerely, Lance.